HU Credits: 3

Degree/Cycle: 2nd degree (Master)

Responsible Department: Occupational therapy

Semester: 1st Semester

Teaching Languages: Hebrew

Campus:

Course/Module Coordinator: Dr. Tami Bar-Shalita

Coordinator Email: barshalitat@mscc.huji.ac.il

Coordinator Office Hours: Monday 12:30-13:30

Teaching Staff:
Tami Bar-Shalita
Prof Shula Parush

Course/Module description:
This seminar deals the central values of the paradigm of occupational therapy and it’s professional perspectives.

Course/Module aims:
• To teach foundation aspects of occupational therapy through a focus on theory and practice

• Provide knowledge of occupational science and its relation to occupational therapy

Learning outcomes - On successful completion of this module, students should be able to:
• identify the paradigm principles resulting from the historical development of occupational therapy
• assess the relationship between theory and paradigm of occupational therapy
• analyse factors of professional practice and theory
• develop practical perspectives related to occupational science
• distinguish between topics of occupational science and occupational therapy

Attendance requirements(%):
100%

Teaching arrangement and method of instruction: Seminar: lectures, discussions, readings, individual learning, student presentations

Course/Module Content:
• the development of the occupational therapy profession over the years
• paradigm change
• ICF and WHO classifications
• Occupational therapy knowledge
• Occupational science and occupational therapy
• Theoretical concepts
• Clinical reasoning
• Evidence based practice
• OTPF
• General models of occupational therapy

Required Reading:
American Occupational Therapy Association. (2000). Occupational therapy code of ethics. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, (6), 614-616.

American Occupational Therapy Association. (2002). Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: Domain and process. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 609-639.

American Occupational Therapy Association2008).). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process. (2nd ed.). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 625-683.

Arthanat, S., Nochajski, S.M., & Stone, J. (2004). The international classification of functioning, disability and health and its application to cognitive disorders. Disability and rehabilitation, 26, 235-245.

Bailey, D.M., & Schwartzberg, S.L. (2003). Ethical and legal dilemmas in
occupational therapy. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.

Baptiste,S.E. (2003). Client-centered practice: implications for our professional approach, behaviors and lexicon. In P. Kramer, J. Hinojosa, & C.B. Royeen (Eds.), Perspectives in Human Occupation (Chapter 9 pp. 264- 277). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Barber, M.D. (2006). Occupational science and the first-person perspective. Journal of Occupational Science, 13, (1), 94-96.

Baum, C. (2003). Participation: It’s relation to occupation and health. Occupation, Participation and Health, 23, 46-47.

Baum, C., Christiansen, C., & Bass-Haugen, J. (2005a). Person-Environment-Occupation-Performance (PEOP)-A model for planning intervention for individuals, organizations and populations. In C. Christiansen, & C. Baum (Eds.), Occupational therapy: Enabling functional well being (3rd ed pp.373-392). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.

Baum, C., & Christiansen, C., (2005b). Person-Environment-Occupation-Performance (PEOP)-An occupation based framework for practice. In C. Christiansen & C. Baum (Eds.), Occupational therapy: Enabling functional well being (3rd ed, pp.243-266). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.

Baum, C. (2000). Reinventing ourselves for the new millennium. OT Practice,3, 12-15.

Bornman, J. (2004). The World Health Organisation's terminology and classification: application to severe disability. Disability & Rehabilitation, 26, (3), 182-188.
Burke, J.P. (2003). Philosophical basis of human occupation. In P. Kramer, J. Hinojosa, & C.B.Royeen (Eds.), Perspectives in Human Occupation (Chapter 3 pp. 32-44). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Christiansen, C.H. & Matuska, K.M. (2006). Lifestyle balance: a review of concepts and research. Journal of Occupational Science, 13, (1), 49-61.

Clark, F. (2006). One Person’s Thoughts on the Future of Occupational Science. Journal of Occupational Science, 13, (3), 167-179.
Clark, F., Azen, S. P., Zemke, R., Jackson, J., Carlson, M., Mandel, D., Hay, J., Josephson, K., Cherry, B., Hessel, C., Palmer, J., & Lipson, L. (1997). Occupational therapy for independent living older adults. JAMA, 278, 1321-1326.
Clark, F.A., Parham, D., Carlson, J., Frank, G., Jackson, J., Pierce, D., Wolfe, R.J., Zemke,R. (1991). Occupational science: academic innovation in the service of occupational therapy's future. American Journal of Occupational Therapy,45, 300-309.
Craik, J., Davis, J., & Polatajko, H.J. (2007). Introducing the Canadian Practice Process Framework (CPPF): Amplifying the context. In E.A. Townsend, & H.J. Polatajko ( eds). Enabling Occupation II: Advancing an Occupational Therapy Vision for Health, Well-being & Justice through Occupation. (Ch 9 pp. 229-246). Ottawa, Canada: CAOT Publications ACE.

Crist, P., & Royeen, C. B. (1997). Infusing occupation into practice: comparison of three clinical approaches in occupational therapy. Bethesda, MD.: American Occupational Therapy Association.
Curtin, C. (2001). Eliciting children’s voices in qualitative research. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 295–302.

Dahi, T.H. (2002). International classification of functioning, disability and health: an introduction and discussion of its potential impact on rehabilitation services and research. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 34, 201-204.

Depoy, E., & Gitlin, L. N. (1998). Introduction to research - understanding and applying multiple strategies (pp. 61-66). St. Louis: Mosby.
Dickie, V., Cutchin, M.P., & Humphry, R. (2006). Occupation as Transactional Experience: A Critique of Individualism in Occupational Science. Journal of Occupational Science, 13, (1), 83-93.

Dunn, W., Brown, C., & McGuigan, A. (1994). The ecology of human performance: A framework for considering the effect of context. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48, 595-607.

Dunn, W., Brown, C., & Youngstrom. (2003). Ecological model of Occupation. In P. Kramer, J. Hinojosa & C.B.Royeen (Eds.) Perspectives in Human Occupation (Chapter 8 pp. 222-263). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Falardeau,M.J. & Durand,M.J. (2002). Negotiation-centered versus client-centered: Which approach should be used? Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy June,135-142.

Farber,B.A. (1996). The Psychotherapy of Carl Rogers: cases and commentaries. N.Y./London:The Guilford Press.

Feldhaus-Weber,M.,(2009).An excerpt from the book of sorrows, book of dreams: a first person narrative. In E.B.Crepeau,E.S.Chon,B.A.Boytschell (Eds). Wiilard & Spackman's Occupational Therapy (10th ed, Ch 4, pp. 49-55). Lippincott Williams & Willking.

Finlay, L. (2001). Holism in occupational therapy: Elusive fiction and ambivalent struggle. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 268–276.

Fleming, M.H. (1994). The therapist with the three-track mind. In C. Mattingley, & M. H. Fleming. Clinical reasoning: Forms of inquiry in a therapeutic practice (pp. 119-136). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.

Forsyth, K. & Kielhofner,G. (2003). Model of human occupation. In P. Kramer, J. Hinojosa & C.B.Royeen (Eds.) Perspectives in Human Occupation (Chapter 4 pp.45 – 86). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Gutman, S. A. (1998). The domain of function: who's got it? who's competing for it? American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 684-689.
Hammell, K.W. (2009). Sacred texts: A sceptical exploration of the assumptions underpinning theories of occupation. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76, 6-13.

Hinojosa, J., Kramer, P., Royeen, C.B., & Luebben, A.J. (2003). Core concept of occupation. In P. Kramer, J. Hinojosa & C.B.Royeen (Eds.) Perspectives in Human Occupation (Chapter 1 pp.1-17). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Hocking,C. (2000). Occupational science: a stock take of accumulated insights. Journal of Occupational Science, 7, (2), 58-67.

Ikiugu, M.N. (2005). Meaningfulness of Occupations as an Occupational-Life-Trajectory Attractor. Journal of Occupational Science, 12, (2), 102-109.

Ikiugu, M.N., & Rosso, H.M. (2005). Understanding the Occupational Human Being
as a Complex, Dynamical, Adaptive System Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 19, (4), 43-65.
Iwama M.(2003). The issue is - toward culturally relevant epistemologies in occupational therapy. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 57, (5), 217-223.

Iwama, M. (2005). The Kawa (river) Model; Nature, Life Flow & the Power of Culturally Relevant Occupational Therapy. In: Kronenberg F., Algado S.A., Pollard N. (Eds). Occupational Therapy Without Borders - Learning from the spirit of survivors. Edinburgh; Churchill Livingstone Elsevier

Jonsson, H. (2008). A New Direction in the Conceptualization and Categorization of Occupation. Journal of Occupational Science 15, ( 1 ) , 3-8.

Kielhofner, G. (2009a). The kind of knowledge needed to support practice. In In G. Kielhofner (Ed.) Conceptual foundations of occupational therapy practice, (4th ed, Ch 2 pp. 8-14). Philadelphia: F.A.Davis.

Kielhofner, G. (2009b). The nature and role of conceptual practice models. In In G. Kielhofner (Ed.) Conceptual foundations of occupational therapy practice, (4th ed, Ch 6 pp. 60-66). Philadelphia: F.A.Davis.

Kielhofner, G. (2009c). The model of human occupation. In G. Kielhofner (Ed.) Conceptual foundations of occupational therapy practice, (4th ed, Ch 11 pp. 147-179). Philadelphia: F.A.Davis.

Kramer, P., Luebben, A.J., Royeen, C.B. & Hinojosa, J. (2003). Reaffirming the importance of occupation. In P. Kramer, J. Hinojosa & C.B.Royeen (Eds.) Perspectives in Human Occupation (Ch 12 pp. 312 – 315). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Larson, E.A. & Zemeke, R. (2003). Shaping the temporal patterns of our lives: the social coordination of occupation. Journal of Occupational Science, 10, (2) 80-89.

Law, M. (Ed.) (1998). Client centered occupational therapy (pp. 1-27). Thorofare NJ: Slack.
Law, M., Cooper, B.A., Strong, S., Stewart, D., Rigby, P., & Letts, L. (1997). Theoretical contexts for the practice of occupational therapy. In C. Christiansen, & C. Baum (Eds.). Occupational therapy enabling function and well being (2nd ed pp. 72-102). Thorofare NJ: Slack.

Law, M., Cooper, B.A., Strong, S.,Stewart, D., Rigby, P., & Letts, L. (1996). The person- environment-occupation model: A transactive approach to occupational performance. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 9-23.

Lawlor,M.C., & Mattingly,C.F. (1997). The complexities embedded in Family-Centered care. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 259-266.

Ludwig, F.M. (2004). Occupation-based and occupation-centered perspectives. In K.F. Walker, & F.M. Ludwig (Eds.) Perspectives on theory for the practice of occupational Therapy (3rd ed, pp. 373-442). Austin TX: PRO-ED.

Luebben, A.J. (2003). Ethical concerns: human occupation. In P. Kramer, J. Hinojosa & C.B.Royeen (Eds.) Perspectives in Human Occupation (Ch. 11 pp. 297-311). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Mattingly, C. (1991). What is clinical reasoning? American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 979-986.

Matuska, K.M., & Christiansen, C.H. (2008). A Proposed Model of Lifestyle Balance. Journal of Occupational Science, 15, (1), 9-19.

McConachie, H., Colver, A. F., Forsyth, R.J., Jarvis, S. N. & Parkinson, K. N. (2006). Participation of disabled children: how should it be characterised
and measured? Disability and Rehabilitation, 28,(18), 1157 – 1164
Miller, R.J., & Schwartz, K. (2004). What is theory and why does it matter? In K.F.Walker, & F.M. Ludwig (Eds.), Perspectives on theory for the practice of occupational Therapy (3rd ed. pp. 1-26). Austin TX: PRO-ED.

Mosey, A.C. (1992). Applied scientific inquiry in the health professions (pp:137-149). Rockville, MD: AOTA.

Nelson, D.L. (1997). Why the profession of occupational therapy will flourish in the 21st century. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51, 11-24.

Nelson, D. L. (2006). Critiquing the logic of the domain section of the Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: Domain and Process. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60, 511–523.

Nelson, D.L. & Jepson-Thomas, J. (2003). Occupational form, occupational performance, and a conceptual framework for therapeutic occupation. In P. Kramer, J. Hinojosa, & C.B.Royeen (Eds.) Perspectives in Human Occupation (Chapter 5 pp. 87- 155). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Parham, D. (1987). Toward professionalism: The reflective therapist. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 41, 555-561.

Pierce, D. (2001). Occupation by design: Dimensions, therapeutic power, and creative process. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 249-259.
Pierce, D. (2001). Untangling occupation and activity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 138-146.
Persson, D. & Erlandsson, L-K. (2002). Time to reevaluate the machine society. Journal of Occupational Science, 9, (2), 93-99.
Polatajko H.J., Davis,J., Stewart, D., Cantin, N., Amoroso, B., Purdie,L., & Zimmerman,D. (2007). Specifying the domain of concern: Occupation as core. In E.A. Townsend, & H.J. Polatajko ( eds). Enabling Occupation II: Advancing an Occupational Therapy Vision for Health, Well-being & Justice through Occupation. Ottawa, Canada: CAOT Publications ACE.

Reid, D. (2008). Exploring the relationship between occupational presence, occupational engagement, and people’s well-being. Journal of Occupational Science, 15 (1), 43-47.

Rigby, P., & Letts, L. (2003). Environment and occupational performance: theoretical considerations. In In L. Letts, & M. Law (Eds.) Using environments to enable occupational performance (pp. 17-32). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.

Rudman, D.L., Dennhardt, S., Fok, f., Huot, S., Molke, D., Park, A., & Zur. B. (2008). A Vision for Occupational Science: Reflecting on our Disciplinary Culture. Journal of Occupational Science, 15,(3), 136-146.

Schkade, J.K., & Schultz, S. (2003). Occupational adaptation. In P. Kramer, J. Hinojosa & C.B.Royeen (Eds.) Perspectives in Human Occupation (Ch 7 pp.181 – 220). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Schwartz, K.B. (2003). History of occupation. In P. Kramer, J. Hinojosa & C.B.Royeen (Eds.) Perspectives in Human Occupation (Chapter 2 pp. 18- 31). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Schwartzberg,S. (2002). Interactive Reasoning in the Practice of Occupational Therapy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson education, Inc.
Stewart D., & Law M. (2003). The environment: Paradigms and practice in health, occupational therapy, and inquiry. In L. Letts, & M. Law (Eds.) Using environments to enable occupational performance (pp. 3-15). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.

Suarez-Balcazar,Y., Rodawoski,J., Balcazar, F., Tylor-Ritzler, T., Portillo,N., Barwacz,D., & Willis, C. (2009). Perceived levels of cultural competence among occupational therapists. American Journal of Occupational Therapy,63(4), 498-505.
Townsend, E. (Ed.) (1997). Enabling Occupation: An occupational therapy perspective (pp. 29-56). Ottawa: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapy.

Trombly, C.A. (1995). Occupation: Purposefulness and meaningfulness as therapeutic mechanisms - 1995 Eleanor Clark Slagle Lecture. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49, 960-972.

Trombly Latham, C.A. (2008). Conceptual foundations for practice. In M.V. Radomski, & C.A. Trombly Latham (Eds.). (2008 .(Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction. ((6 th ed, Ch.1 .).(Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer/ Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Van Eenwyk, J.R. (1991). The chaotic dynamics of everyday life. The Quest, 40-47.

Walker, K.F. (2004). Analysis of the theories. In K.F. Walker, & F.M. Ludwig (Eds.) Perspectives on theory for the practice of occupational Therapy (3rd ed, pp. 443-507). Austin TX: PRO-ED.

Wilcock, A.A. (2007). Occupation and Health: Are They One and the Same? Journal of Occupational Science, 14, (1), pp 3-8.

Wilcock, A. & Whiteford G. (2003). Occupation, health promotion, and the environment. In L. Letts, & M. Law (Eds.) Using environments to enable occupational performance (pp. 55-70). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.

Wressle,E., Eeg-Olofsson, A.M. Marcusson,J. & Henriksson, C. (2002). Improved client participation in the rehabilitation process using a client- centred goal formulation structure. J Rehabil Med, 34, 5–11.

World Health Organisation. (2001) International classification of functioning disability and health. Geneva: WHO

Yerxa, E.J. (1991). Occupational Therapy: An endangered species or an academic discipline in the 21st century? American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 680-685.

Yerxa, E.J. (1993). Occupational science: A new source of power for participants in occupational therapy. Occupational Science Australia, 1, 3-9.

Yerxa, E.J. (2000). Occupational science: A renaissance of service to humankind through knowledge. Occupational Therapy International, 7, 87-98.

Yerxa, E.J. (2009). Infinite distance between the I and the It. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 490-497.

Yerxa, E.J., Clark, F.A., Parham, D., Carlson, M.E., Frank, G., Jackson, J. Pierce, D., Stein, C., & Zemke, R. (1989). An introduction to occupational science, A foundation for occupational therapy in the 21st century. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 6, 1-17.

CRITICALLY APPRAISED TOPIC (CAT):
http://ot.creighton.edu/community/EvidenceReviews/OTD%20541_10/Dyer_CAT_May_2010.pdf

גוטמן ד. (2001). אתיקה למקצועות טיפוליים. תל-אביב: דיונון. עמ' 17-33.

ילון-חיימוביץ, ש., זק"ש, ד., ויינטראוב, נ., נוטה, א., מזור, נ., ושות'. (2006). מרחב ותהליך העשייה המקצועית בריפוי בעיסוק בישראל. תל-אביב: העמותה הישראלית לריפוי בעיסוק.

כץ.נ. (1992). ריפוי בעיסוק ומדע העיסוק. כתב עת ישראלי לריפוי בעיסוק , 3, H91-99.

כץ.נ. (1997). מדע העיסוק וריפוי בעיסוק בשנות ה- 2000. כתב עת ישראלי לריפוי בעיסוק , 137-147H.

פרוש,ש. (2003). ריפוי בעיסוק על בסיס ראיות- Evidence based practice האתגר המקצועי במאה ה-21. כתב-עת ישראלי לריפוי בעיסוק,12 (2),57 H- 73H.

קבוצת מתע"מ. (2009). מרחב ותהליך העשיה המקצועית בריפוי בעיסוק בישראל (מתע"מ). מהלכה למעשה, תיעוד על פי המתע"מ: טפסים ודוחות. תל אביב: העמותה הישראלית לריפוי בעיסוק.


ספרים הכוללים מודלים שונים להתערבות:
Bruce, M.A., & Borg, B. (1993). Psychosocial occupational therapy, frames of reference for intervention. Second edition. Thorofare, NJ: Slack.

Katz, N. (2005). Cognition and occupation across the life span: Models for intervention in occupational therapy. Bethesda MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.

Kielhofner, G. (2004). Conceptual foundations of occupational therapy. Philadelphia: F.A.Davis. Third edition.

Kramer, P., Hinojosa, J., & Royeen, C.B. (2003). Perspectives in Human Occupation. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Ch, 5 & 8

Kronenberg, F., Algado, S.A., & Pollard N. (Eds). (2005). Occupational Therapy Without Borders - Learning from the spirit of survivors, Edinburgh; Churchill Livingstone Elsevier.

Letts, L., Rigby, P., Stewart, D. (Eds). Using environments to enable occupational performance. Thorofare, NJ: Slack.

Pedretti, L.W. & Early, M.B. (Eds). (2001). Occupational Therapy practice skills for physical dysfunction. St Louis: Mosby.

Townsend, E. (Ed.) (1997). Enabling Occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapy

M.V. Radomski, & C.A. Trombly Latham (Eds.). (2008 .(Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction. ((6 th ed, pp. .).(Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer/ Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Stein, F., & Cutler, S.K. (1998). Psychosocial occupational therapy: A holistic approach. San Diego: Singular Publication Group Inc.

Walker, K.F., & Ludwig, F.M (Eds.) (2004). Perspectives on theory for the practice of occupational Therapy (3rd ed). Austin TX: PRO-ED.

Additional Reading Material:

Course/Module evaluation:
End of year written/oral examination 50 %
Presentation 40 %
Participation in Tutorials 0 %
Project work 0 %
Assignments 10 %
Reports 0 %
Research project 0 %
Quizzes 0 %
Other 0 %

Additional information: