Syllabus - Multi-Party Environmental Conflict Workshop (40949)

Syllabus Multi-Party Environmental Conflict Workshop - 40949
עברית

Students needing academic accommodations based on a disability should contact the Center for Diagnosis and Support of Students with Learning Disabilities, or the Office for Students with Disabilities, as early as possible, to discuss and coordinate accommodations, based on relevant documentation. For further information, please visit the site of the Dean of Students Office.
Print

PDF version
Last update 24-09-2019
HU Credits: 2 Degree/Cycle: 2nd degree (Master) Responsible Department: Geography Semester: 2nd Semester Teaching Languages: Hebrew Campus: Mt. Scopus Course/Module Coordinator: Amitay Har-Lev Coordinator Email: amitay@modus.org.il Coordinator Office Hours: Half an hour before each lesson Teaching Staff: Mr. Amitay Har-Lev Course/Module description: The environmental field, in the broader sense of the term, is a fertile ground for complex conflicts. The rushed development on the one hand and the rise in information accessibility and citizens' power to organize and take action on the other hand, stress the need to find the right equilibria between the requirements of different and diverse interested parties. This course will open a window to the world of Mutual Gains Approach as the conceptual foundation of environmental conflicts' prevention, management and settlement through multilateral mediation processes and the construction of consensus. In this course, students from different circles and disciplines can meet and work together to achieve the understanding, tools and skills necessary for environmental conflicts' management, performing the initial and most important stage in any project management – professional conflict assessment. Course/Module aims: The course's goals are: ◦The student will learn the conceptual foundation of the Mutual Gains Approach and the Collaborative Paradigm of environmental conflicts' management; ◦The student will learn and implement a structured model of mapping, analysis and assessment in an environmental conflict situation; The student will acquire and implement an effective "toolbox" for handling environmental conflicts through processes of multilateral mediation and the agreement building Learning outcomes - On successful completion of this module, students should be able to: ◦Understand the environmental conflict situation; ◦Analyze the conflict using applicable models; ◦Discern and implement key terms in the Mutual Gains Approach; ◦Map interested parties and essential information regarding the environmental conflict; ◦Assess the environmental conflict's suitability to the processes of dialogue and agreement building; ◦Successfully implement effective tools in conflict management. Attendance requirements(%): 75% Teaching arrangement and method of instruction: Frontal teaching is accompanied by work in small groups, workshops, simulations, peer instruction and guest speakers, as well as presentation of the course's products by the students. A field day is tentative. Course/Module Content: Introduction to ADR Oppositional vs. collaborative paradigms What is agreement building – definition What is an environmental conflict – key stages in the process of building agreements in environmental conflicts. Conflict assessment model. Criteria for the assessment of the conflict's level of suitability to mediation and agreement building processes. Writing a summary report; possible layouts. Conducting an interview; types of interviews and types of information. Contents analysis. Ethical questions. Toolbox. Required Reading: • סוסקינד, ל. (1999), "מדריך קצר לבניית קונסנסוס: חלופה כללי הסדר של רוברט לקבוצות, ארגונים וכינוסים אד-הוק המעונינים לפעול על פי קונסנסוס". • הר לב, א. דיין, מ. (2014) ממשק דייג מקיים בים התיכון לחופי ישראל. הערכת מצב. • בן גל, מ. צלינגר, נ. הר לב, א. (2006) מתקן לטיפול תרמי מתקדם בפסולת אעבלין. הערכת גישור. • הר לב, א. (2006). הערכת גישור כפר החורש. • הר לב, א. (2004) הערכת קונפליקט מתן ירחיב. • הר לב, א. גביע, ח (2014), Pilot מיחזור והפרדת פסולת במקור בפרדס חנה כרכור. הערכת המצב והתאמתו לתהליך דיאלוג ובניית הסכמות. • שמואלי, ד. ומ. בן גל, 2001. הערכת קונפליקט לצורך קידום דיאלוג בין הגורמים המעורבים בנושא טפול וסילוק שפכים תעשייתים באגן נחל קישון תחתון. (כרך א וכרך ב) • Susskind, L. and J. Thomas-Larmer, “Conducting a Conflict Assessment” Chapter 2 in: Susskind, McKearnan, and Thomas-Larmer, p. 99-135. Additional Reading Material: מבוא ל- ADR. הפרדיגמה הלעומתית ביחס לפרדיגמה השיתופית • אלברשטיין, מ. (2007). תורת הגישור. הוצאת ספרים מאגנס. • גלין, א. (2005).משא ומתן - הממד החבוי. הוצאת רמות – אוניברסיטת תל-אביב. • סיכום חיובי (לשאת ולתת בלי לוותר). ר'וגר פישר, ויליאם יורי. • Bush, R. A. Baruch and Folger, J. P. (2005). The Promise of Mediation: The Transformative Approach to Conflict. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Pp. 41-84. • Cobb, S. (1993). Empowerment and mediation: A narrative perspective. Negotiation Journal, 9, 245–259. • Winslade, J., Monk, G. and Cotter, A. (1998). A Narrative Approach to the Practice of Mediation. Negotiation Journal, 14 (1). 21-41. • Winslade, J., and Monk, G. (2000). "Narrative mediation: A new approach to conflict resolution". San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. • Goss, J. (1995). An Introduction to Alternative Dispute Resolution. Alberta Law Review, 34 (1). Pp. 1-33. • Laue, J. H. (1990). The Emergence and Institutionalization of Third-party Roles in Conflict. In: John Burton and Frank Dukes (Eds.), Conflict: Readings in Management and Resolution, Macmillan. 256-272. • Hoffman, D. A. (2006). The Future of ADR Practice: Three Hopes, Three Fears, and Three Predictions. Negotiation Journal, October 2006, 467-473. • Roger Fisher and William Ury, 1991. Getting to Yes, 2nd Edition, New York: Penguin Press. • David Lax and James Sebenius, 1986. The Manager as Negotiator, New York: The Free Press. • Susan Carpenter and W.J.D. Kennedy, 1998. Managing Public Disputes, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. • Lawrence Susskind and Jeffrey Cruikshank, 1987. Breaking the Impasse, New York: Harper & Row. • Susskind L., McKearnan, S. and J. Thomas-Larmer, 1999. The Consensus Building Handbook, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. בניית קונסנזוס. קונפליקט סביבתי. מהות ומקורות. • Susskind, L., McKeanan, S. and Thomas-Larmer, J. (1999). The Consensus Building Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to Reaching Agreement. Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage Publications. Pp. 99-135. Pp 711-741. קונפליקט וניהולו. מאפייני סכסוכים סביבתיים, מקורות של קונפליקט • Roger Fisher and William Ury, 1991. Getting to Yes, 2nd Edition, New York: Penguin Press. Chapter 1. Chapter 2. • David Lax and James Sebenius, 1986. The Manager as Negotiator, New York: The Free Press. Chapter 1. • Susan Carpenter and W.J.D. Kennedy, 1998. Managing Public Disputes, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Chapter 1. מודל לניתוח קונפליקט סביבתי - Conflict Assessment • Susan Carpenter and W.J.D. Kennedy, 1998. Managing Public Disputes, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Chapter 4. • דניאלי, ד. ושמואלי, ד., 1999, "קונפליקטים בתכנון, פיתוח ואיכות הסביבה: הערכת קונפליקט כביש חוצה ישראל" ינואר 1999 • רמון, א. פייטלסון, ע., 1999, "קונפליקטים בתכנון, פיתוח ואיכות הסביבה: הערכת קונפליקט פיתוח נמל תעופה בן-גוריון" ינואר 1999 תפיסת סכסוכים על ידי בעלי עניין והשפעתה על התפתחות הסכסוך • Shmueli, D. and M. Ben Gal, 2004. “Stakeholder Frames in the Mapping of the Lower • Kishon River Basin Conflict,” Conflict Resolution Quarterly, January, 21:2 יישוב קונפליקטים רב-צדדים • McCreary, S. "Resolving Science - Intensive Public Policy Disputes" Case 6 in: Susskind., McKearnan and Thomas-Larmer, p. 829-858 • Susskind, L. and G. McMahon, 1985. " The Theory and Practice of Negotiated Rulemaking", Yale Journal on Regulation Vol. 33, pp. 133-165. Course/Module evaluation: End of year written/oral examination 0 % Presentation 0 % Participation in Tutorials 10 % Project work 60 % Assignments 30 % Reports 0 % Research project 0 % Quizzes 0 % Other 0 % Additional information:

Print