|
HU Credits:
2
Degree/Cycle:
2nd degree (Master)
Responsible Department:
social work
Semester:
2nd Semester
Teaching Languages:
Hebrew
Campus:
Mt. Scopus
Course/Module Coordinator:
Dafna Tener
Coordinator Office Hours:
Wednesday 12:00-14:00 By appointment only
Wednesday 15:00-16:00
Teaching Staff:
Dr. Dafna Tener
Course/Module description:
The course is designed for those writing qualitative thesis and deals with qualitative analysis of qualitative data.
Course/Module aims:
This is a practical course. It aims to help students who are in the process of performing their qualitative thesis. The course will focus on the analysis of qualitative data and will be based on the thematic analysis approach. It will be based on the students' work (interviews) as well as their dilemmas.
Learning outcomes - On successful completion of this module, students should be able to:
-Develop knowledge about the methods of qualitative data analysis while encouraging thinking qualitatively
-Experience qualitative analysis using data collected by the course participants.
- Experience in presenting a chapter on the findings of the research.
Attendance requirements(%):
100%
Teaching arrangement and method of instruction:
Frontal lectures
Exercises based on materials presented by the course participants.
Guest lecturers are planned
Course/Module Content:
Basics of thematic analysis
Thematic analysis concepts and issues
Analysis based on students materials
Writing the findings chapter
Required Reading:
ניתוח איכותני: מבוא
*Flick, U. (2006). An introduction to qualitative research. London: Sage Publications. Chapter 8, Pp. 97-104.
ניתוח נתונים בגישה תמטית
* Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research, 1(3), 385-4
* Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology.Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-10.
ניתוח בגישה האיכותנית פנומנולוגית
*Giorgi, A. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Duquesne University Press. Chapter 5 Pp. 87-93.
* Giorgi, A. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Duquesne University Press. Chapter 5, Pp. 120-137.
* Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Sage. Pp. 79-108.
ניתוח בגישת התאוריה מעוגנת בנתוניםֿ
*Corbin & Strauss (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Pp. 65-87
*Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Pine Forge Press.Pp 42-71
* Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge
University Press. Pp. 22-34.
*Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge
University Press. Pp. 55-75.
החוקר ככלי המחקר:
*Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (2003). Learning in the field: An introduction to
qualitative research. Sage., Pp 48-59.
* During the semester other bibliographic materials may be added
Additional Reading Material:
ניתוח איכותני: מבוא
Flick, U. (2006). An introduction to qualitative research. London: Sage Publications. Chapter 5, Pp. 57-64.
Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. Pp. 482-492.
ניתוח בגישה האיכותנית פנומנולוגית
Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Sage. Pp. 135-146.
Spinelli, E. (2005). The interpreted world: An introduction to phenomenological psychology. Sage. Chapter 2, The phenomenological method. Pp. 19-34.
http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/ebookviewer/ebook/bmxlYmtfXzI4MzUyMF9fQU41?sid&eq;a5c0ccec-3b38-4d12-b086-53d64a5b836e@sessionmgr4001&vid&eq;1&format&eq;EB&rid&eq;1
Spinelli, E. (2005). The interpreted world: An introduction to phenomenological psychology. Sage. Chapter 2, The phenomenological method. Pp. 48-50.
http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/ebookviewer/ebook/bmxlYmtfXzI4MzUyMF9fQU41?sid&eq;a5c0ccec-3b38-4d12-b086-53d64a5b836e@sessionmgr4001&vid&eq;1&format&eq;EB&rid&eq;1
ניתוח בגישת התאוריה מעוגנת בנתוניםֿ
1
* Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge
University Press. Pp. 22-34.
Strauss, A.L. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and
procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Pp. 101-121.
Strauss, A.L. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and
procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Pp. 123-142.
Strauss, A.L. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Pp. 143-161.
גבתון, דן (2001). תיאוריה המעוגנת בשדה: משמעות תהליך ניתוח הנתונים ובניית התיאוריה במחקר
איכותני. בתוך: צבר בן יהושע, נ. (ע'). מסורות וזרמים במחקר האיכותני. כינרת זמורה ביתן, דביר
מוציאים לאור. עמ' 195-227.
החוקר ככלי המחקר:
Rager, K. B. (2005). Self-care and the qualitative researcher: When collecting data
can break your heart. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 23-27.
קריאה נוספת:
ליבליך, ע., תובל-משיח, ר. וזילבר, ת. (2010). בין השלם וחלקיו, ובין תוכן לצורה. בתוך ל. קסן ומ.
קרומר נבו (עורכות), ניתוח נתונים במחקר איכותני (עמ' 21-42). באר שבע: אוניברסיטת בן
גוריון.
Course/Module evaluation:
End of year written/oral examination 0 %
Presentation 0 %
Participation in Tutorials 0 %
Project work 0 %
Assignments 0 %
Reports 0 %
Research project 0 %
Quizzes 0 %
Other 100 %
Take home test
Additional information:
Course requirements
1.To be fully attended in class .
2. Presenting interview analysis at class
3. Reading and providing feedback to peers
3. Take-Home exam
|
